Who Was Mystery Person #28? • Anna Sayce

Your information will not be shared.

Who Was Mystery Person #28?

Intuitive Experiment 28.2
Intuitive Experiment 28
The person in this experiment is Svetlana Alliluyeva, the only daughter and last surviving child of Joseph Stalin and his second wife Nadezhda Alliluyeva. Her defection to the United States in 1967 brought her a great deal of notoriety, and led to a long life of wandering, writing, and searching for love.

Early Life and Marriages

Alliluyeva was born on February 28, 1926, as Svetlana Iosifovna Stalina. After the death of her father, she adopted her mother’s last name. Nadezhda died when Svetlana was only six years old (most likely a suicide), but because her mother’s death was officially ruled to be the result of a burst appendix, Svetlana did not learn the truth of it until many years later.

Although Stalin was responsible for the deaths of millions of people under his brutal regime, his relationship with his daughter was initially quite close and loving. He was very affectionate with her, gave her numerous gifts, and referred to her as his “little sparrow.” Svetlana became something of a celebrity, with countless infants named after her, and products created specifically in her honor.

When she was 16, Alliluyeva fell in love with 40 year old Jewish filmmaker Aleksei Kapler. Her father was very much against the union, and Kapler was later sentenced to 10 years in exile near the Arctic Circle.

Then at age 17, Svetlana met and married Grigory Morozov while they were both studying at Moscow University, and they had a son named Iosif in 1945. The marriage was short-lived, however, and they divorced in 1947.

Svetlana married for the second time in 1949, in an arranged union with Yuri Zhdanov, son of Stalin’s right hand associate. In 1950 she gave birth to a daughter, Yekaterina, but that marriage failed as well a brief time later.

After Stalin died in 1953, Svetlana found work in Moscow as a lecturer and translator. Her interest was in writing and literature, but her father forced her to study history and politics instead. She was also fluent in several different languages, such as German, French, and English.

In 1963, Svetlana begin a relationship with an Indian Communist named Kunwar Brajesh Singh, whom she met while they were both in hospital. They fell deeply in love, but were not allowed to marry. Singh was very ill with bronchiectasis and emphysema, and passed away in 1966. Svetlana was allowed to carry his ashes to India to sprinkle into the Ganges River; while there, she engaged with local customs and gained in interest in religion, abandoning the atheism of her native country. She later referred to Singh as her husband, even though they were never officially married.

Defection to the United States

In 1967, Svetlana arrived at the United States Embassy in New Delhi, and requested political asylum. Despite doubts from the United States that helping her to defect might damage relations with Moscow, President Lyndon B. Johnson approved Svetlana’s request, and she was granted asylum on humanitarian grounds. Some reports indicate that the K.G.B. was considering assassinating Alliluyeva at the time, and her departure may have prevented that outcome.

Upon arriving in New York in April 1967, Svetlana denounced the Soviet regime, and published her autobiography, entitled “Twenty Letters to a Friend” in the latter part of that year. The book garnered her $2.5 million in royalties, and was followed in 1969 by her second memoir, “Only One Year.”

Alliluyeva initially settled in Princeton, New Jersey, where she continued to denounce her father and the “profoundly corrupt” Soviet system, and eventually converted to Catholicism.

Later Life, Travels, and Death

Despite missing her adult children, Iosif and Yekaterina, who remained in Russia, Svetlana found comfort in a new relationship with William Wesley Peters. Mr. Peters was an apprentice of architect Frank Lloyd Wright, whose widow, Olgivanna Wright, happily encouraged the union. Wright believed that Alliluyeva was the mystical replacement for her own deceased daughter, who was also named Svetlana.

Alliluyeva and Peters married in 1970, and had a daughter, Olga, on May 20, 1971. Svetlana changed her name to Lana Peters, and joined the Taliesin Fellowship – a group of architects and designers in Wisconsin who remained committed to Frank Loyd Wright’s work. Finding herself chafing under the strict rules of the fellowship, however, Svetlana’s marriage to Peters failed within two years. She obtained US citizenship in 1978, then moved to Cambridge, England with her daughter in 1982.

Svetlana returned to the Soviet Union in 1984, in the hopes of reconciling with her older children, with whom she had had very little communication since her departure. At this point Alliluyeva began to denounce the West, claiming that she had been a pet of the C.I.A., and had not known “one single day” of freedom during her life there.

The hoped-for reconciliation with her children did not materialize, however, and in 1986 she returned to the United States – settling once again in Wisconsin, and claiming that her anti-Western sentiments had simply been mistranslated.

Svetlana’s latter years involved a great deal of moving around: from the United States to the United Kingdom, where she became a British citizen in 1992, then back to the U.S. to live on a permanent visa, although she chose to remain a British citizen.

Despite her travels she always returned eventually to Wisconsin, however, and it was there that she died at age 85 on November 22, 2011, from complications due to colon cancer.

Intuitive Hits

A few readers picked up on Svetlana’s Russian ancestry – great work there! Many of you also correctly observed that she had three children, and that she was the child of a well-known, powerful political figure. Kudos to Eagle for picking up on 1926, which is the year Alliluyeva was born.

Shondra‘s vision of a bird in connection to Svetlana is particularly interesting, since her father often referred to her as “little sparrow.” Those who felt that Alliluyeva may have had mental instabilities might have been picking up on the enormous stress and feeling of persecution that she suffered from being the daughter of such an infamous figure.

Sheena is also correct in noting that Alliluyeva suffered abuse and great loss while growing up, and Lindy picked up on the death of Svetlana’s mother in early childhood.

Several readers also pointed out on the fact that Svetlana was a writer and lecturer. As Victoria Arrington observed, Alliluyeva had a painful experience as a mother, due to the prolonged separation from her older children after her defection to the United States. And she did indeed pass from cancer, as Erin correctly noted.

Johanna was right to say that Svetlana had been cherished and protected in childhood, but had a much more difficult road to travel when she was older. This may have provoked her more literal fondness for traveling, and her inability to settle down or find true peace in any one location, as Isla, Jess, and Mon observed.

Alliluyeva may have been a bit of a nomad, but it is clear that (as David pointed out), her experience of persecution, trauma, and wartime had a profound effect on the way she experienced life in her latter years. She always seem to be searching for a sense of permanence, location, and meaning that she perhaps never quite achieved, but which was certainly understandable under the circumstances. Svetlana deserves credit for the fact that she continued to seek it out, though, which in the end may be the best that can be expected of anyone traveling on their own spiritual journey.

Overall, there were a lot of astute and specific hits from readers this time around. Keep brushing up on your skills, and another experiment will be posted soon!

Would you like to learn how to receive direct guidance from your Higher self and Spirit Guides, and find out more about your soul’s purpose?

You might be interested in my Intuitive Awakening Course

Here are some of the things past students have said about it:

“I was able to get great interactive results from both Anna as well as others. The audio as well as the written material helped me to experience the training further than simply reading. The guidance received during the course via the forum, and the materials were well worth the price.” – Bryan Stewart

“This is a powerful course, though it requires patience and practice. There is a return for your effort and I found the guided meditations to be very powerful and even life changing. I had a lot of ambivalence starting out and I can say confidently that that is no longer the case. I am overwhelmed daily with gratitude and compassion. I am grateful for this course.” – Herb Cohen

“I thoroughly enjoyed the Intuitive Awakening course for several reasons. The obvious is that I become more intuitive and was able to strengthen my psychic abilities, gaining the confidence to use these skills daily. The not so obvious reason I would highly recommend this course is for the organization. It provided me with clear and succinct focus. Before beginning the course I felt scattered and unclear about which book, meditation or exercise I should practice to achieve my intuitive goals. Anna’s course took me through the exact processes and exercises so that my skills advanced at the right level without me feeling overwhelmed by the information. Thank you.” – Danna Yahav

Learn more about Intuitive Awakening.

 

4 Comments

  1. Thank you, Anna, for the experiment and for the biography of this fascinating woman. I’m looking forward to the next experiment and the choice you’ll be making. Kudos for your wonderful site, blog and links.

  2. Is there a way to access previous “mystery people” with hidden answer that can be accessed when member ready?

    Magic 🎱 says ?

  3. Thanks for another interesting experiment, I didn’t articulate my impressions and the images very well but I’m pleased with my effort, I definitely had the overall impression of white European non English speaking and the Amsterdam type buildings with canals and the bicycle culture with the fields of oats or wheat near by, enforcing my image of my interpretation of white European a non English speaking person (though she probably did speak English). I could see a singing swan not a honking aggressive swan, not sure about what that meant, I could clearly see her in a hospital setting maybe caring for someone (the Indian guy?), I felt foreboding around ww2 espionage or fascism (I suppose communism) I definitely got writer or writing, and something she was pushing behind her, hiding it, I suppose the communist family background, overall I’m pleased, so I need to work more on each series of images and see more detail, as usual thanks for your effort, help and guidance in offering these experiments, regards Brett

  4. Thank you so much, Anna for posting this detailed answer! Wow, Stalin’s daughter! Seems like a pretty intensive life…. I’m glad to hear I picked up on the year! Appreciate these exercises, looking forward for more! :)E


I love comments on my blog, and appreciate feedback. To keep this blog a helpful & positive space, a few rules apply to comments:

  1. If posting a request for help or advice, please note that Anna cannot guarantee a personal response as we get many comments daily.

  2. Comments need to be respectful to be approved. Constructive criticism and disagreement are OK, ad hominem attacks are not.

  3. Promotional comments will not be approved
Thank you


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *